Audience targeting: so-called consumer watchdogs should get a life
Attention, watchdogs. You are sniffing up the wrong butt!
Mark Rogers Photography on dogster.com
Consumer watchdogs, privacy advocates and others who prefer government regulation to industry self-regulation of data collection, cookie tracking and behavioral targeting put entirely too much faith in government.
Ironically, they’re even more wrong about how well any of this actually works in practice today on the web.
As an industry insider, I do all that I can within the bounds of safe computing to optimize my computer to allow cookie-setters, data gatherers and targeters to show me what they can do. Most often, the results are only fair or poor. On rare occasions, a truly relevant message appears that surprises and delights me and, more important, offers me something I’m actually interested in at that moment.
If it’s usually difficult for me to see the effects – good or bad – from the use of my data for commercial purposes, how is it possible that people with no inside knowledge are dead certain that malevolent forces are out to destroy our privacy via online targeting?
1. It’s not easy to be targeted. 
Every browser, anti-virus and pc optimizer program, among other widely-used applications, makes it increasingly difficult specifically to allow your machine to be targeted. This simple example comes from a routine scan (AVG, free version) of a machine which has been set and reset numerous times to ignore every one of these widely known, safe sources of ad deliveries and/or audience analytics. A typical consumer would take the virus warnings seriously and would promptly remove and prohibit such common cookies, which help make browsing more convenient and relevant.
2. On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.
The New Yorker cartoon by Peter Steiner generally is still true 12 years later. Sure it’s possible for hackers, law enforcement and others to piece together a story from your many web activities. Since you purposely leave your life’s details all over social networks, it hardly requires a visit from the internet czar to figure out what you’re up to. You can still choose not to reveal anything about yourself online by, well, refraining from using the web, email, IM, etc. Then only your supermarket, credit card issuers, banks, department stores and cataloguers, U.S. Postal Service and many, many others will know all your details. Just unplug your computer and you’re safe at last.
Do you worry that we’re only a step away from Orwell’s omniscient telescreen? I choose to obey the law and not worry. I’d rather enjoy the benefits of the web, including legitimate commercial uses by companies that are guided by respectful consumer-friendly principles and profit-driven innovation.
3. Behavior – online or off – can be misleading. After reading “Find Me Again: A Blizzard of Retargeting,” I visited several sections of the Skechers site, beginning with the women’s shoes section, likely to be the most valuable and heavily-tagged and trafficked part of the site for research purposes. Next step was to go to my Yahoo! Mail account and, sure enough, the parade of Skechers ads – all targeting women – began appearing. Six weeks later, I still see them all the time.
One visit to the women’s shoes department and they retarget me to death. I assume they can do this because they pay only for specific actions generated from ads on inexpensive and plentiful exchange and network inventory.
To the company’s credit, Skechers has been very open about their marketing efforts. In addition to the Behavioral Insider article, there are Skechers case studies from AudienceScience and MyBuys, among others, and open discussion at conferences. If the privacy fearmongers would read some of these, they might be further inflamed by the casual references to targeting consumers. Or they may get the idea that this practice is widespread, innocuous (even if some find it annoying) and, at its best, it results in a satisfying experience for the consumer and the advertiser. If they were to read further, they might even come to understand that this popular and simple form of retargeting is not particularly accurate or effective.
My first Skechers ad on Yahoo! arrived courtesy of Blue Lithium, but it might easily have been associated with other sources identified on the Skechers site on July 1, 2009, including Acerno, AudienceScience, Burst, Fastclick, Fetchback, Interclick, Trafficmp, Tribal Fusion.
4. Will the big dog hunt?
On the web, Google is like the world’s tallest dog, Gibson, measuring more than seven feet tall standing up. He appears to be friendly, but you can imagine how fearsome a presence this towering Great Dane makes, and how he must garner equal measures of respect and terror even among dog lovers.
Google introduced its flavor of interest-based targeting several months ago, so I promptly signed up for over a dozen different categories of business and consumer interests. Ho-hum … I have noticed exactly ONE ad that may have been a result of this program.
Interest-based targeting on Google: not interesting
If the big dog keeps up this performance, you watchdogs can move on to a new fire hydrant in someone else’s industry.
